This assignment provides you the opportunity to evaluate the effectiveness of an absolute rating system (specifically, a graphic rating scale) system from a design perspective.

OVERVIEW

This assignment provides you the opportunity to evaluate the effectiveness of an absolute rating system (specifically, a graphic rating scale) system from a design perspective.

LEARNING OUTCOMES

This assignment provides you with an opportunity to demonstrate the development and achievement of the following course learning outcomes:

  • Identify the key criteria for the design of an effective performance appraisal system.
  • Apply the principles of effective design to evaluate the effectiveness of a graphic rating scale performance evaluation system.

INSTRUCTIONS

Review the criteria for effective performance measures in the text [1] (pages 197 to 203 – Catano, H. W. (2021). Recruitment and Selection in Canada. Toronto: Nelson, 8th edition). Specifically, focus on the following criteria:

  • Validity (the degree to which the criteria are job-related and able to predict performance)
  • Reliability (the degree to which use of the system will produce the same results with respect to the employee’s performance across time or when applied by different raters)
  • Fairness (the employee’s perception that the system is fair in that the performance criteria defined are within the employee’s control)
  • Practical (the system is not time-consuming to use and produces useful feedback for the employee)

With reference to the sample graphic rating scale for a professor [picture below], evaluate its effectiveness with respect to the criteria outlined on pages 197 to 203.

OR

  • Select a graphic rating scale that you have used to evaluate staff or have had used to evaluate your performance and evaluate its effectiveness with respect to the criteria outlined on pages 197 to 203. Attach a sample of the form with your submission

 

phpUiya1u.jpeg

Last Name First MI Appraisal Period from: to: Performance Factor Employee Supervisor (Use Performance Factor Definitions as a Guide) Rating Rating IV. Results 12 Resourcefulness 13 Problem-Solving 14. Perseverance 15. Agility 16. Meets Objectives Average score for this section: Comments: V. Character 17. Ethics 18. Conduct 19. Core Values 20 Supports Diversity Average score for this section: Comments: VI. Leadership and/or Management 21 Planning 22. Execution 23. Organization 24. Innovation 25. Style 26. Change Agent Average score for this section: Comments: Clear Page 3?